Bankers, Welfare and Post-modernism

The letter below should explain itself. Here is a link to the relevant article.

Dear Sir,
Every so often Evangelicals Now inserts an article of such appalling quality I feel tempted to send in a letter from “Disgusted of Bow”. Today is such a day.
It seems there is a “fatal” flaw in western democracy. A certain cause of death? Apparently. Our democracies are under sentence of death because of modern welfare systems. And what sort of sociologist or deep political thinker has seen into this tragic future? Why non of those shallow analysts. Rather a member of that one profession whom we can trust with our economic futures , a banker!
Referring to no scripture but serially invoking the bête noir of Evangelicals Now, post-modernism, Steve Gandy assures us from his lofty perch that “Deficit Financing” is to blame, as if our banks were not chronically addicted to gambling huge multiples of the money deposited with them.
He deprecates politicians who use offshore funds to avoid paying tax. Much larger sums are being squirrelled away by senior bankers. And it is the banks who organise and run such schemes.
The real target of the article is the Welfare State. Yet, the banks are recipients of state welfare on a massive scale. By means of buy-ins, bailouts, quantitative easing and near zero interest rates (only for banks of course) the poor taxpayer is paying for the ignorant or criminal errors of “senior banking executives” in London.
Lastly, no article like this is complete without a veiled reference to the “German menace”. Sure enough, it crops up in the very last article. We are replaying the Weimar Republic years and we know who came next.
Dear Editor, if you do not have enough material for your newspaper why not leave a page blank? Scrap paper is always handy.
Incidentally, could you give PostModern Relativism a rest? People have always been moral relativists when it comes to money. Conversion to Christ is the only cure.
Your slightly depressed brother,
Erik Pattison.



Do we come to God when we go to church?

There is a new post on my theology blog on this topic. By and large, I do think church attendance is central to Christian living . Click here to read the post.

Pseudoscience, creationism and the Mainstream

As usual, Steven Shapin adds something insightful to a faithful book review in the LRB. Looking at the amazingly popular Pseudoscience of “Worlds in Collision” (author Immanuel Velikovksy) through the lens of a new book The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe by Michael Gordin. But it is not just a review of a review. It is about whether we can even say exactly what Pseudoscience is and a look at how and why it becomes popular.

He kindly does not explore how Creationism (the biggest current Pseudoscience in the West) mirrors and repeats the same pattern – right down to creating a parallel Scientism to the one it parodies. I won’t say more – it would be redundant. Here is the link.

Tony Judt – Social Democracy is the new conservatism

I have just finished reading “Ill fares the Land”, written by Tony Judt. It is the Penguin paperback (ISBN 978-0718191412) obtained through the computer reservation system at my local Idea Store (library, in English).
Ill Fares the Land
It is the work of a dying man (now gone) and it was odd to see the old arguments of “progressive” thought being presented as real conservatism. For quite a while now the progressive, social democratic ideals which grew up in response to the inequalities of the first age of globalisation, the Great War (WW1) and subsequent economic oppression have been denigrated as stale and discredited. Neo-liberal economic thinking rules and the idea of a morally guided politics seems naive in the age of Blair and Cameron.

Judt wants a return to properly state-run natural monopolies (rather than the privatised nonsenses which are our rail and domestic energy “markets”). But, even more, he wants the return of anger, passion and conscience to our political thinking and an active citizenry keeping our value-free politicians on track. it is almost a left-wing version of a “Moral Rearmament” (under-60’s can Google it) tract.

The strange thing about Mrs. Thatcher was that her rhetoric did not match her actions. Contrary to myth, she did not cut hard into public services. Her governments balanced the books by surfing the wave of money provided by North Sea Oil. But what she had managed was to change the tone of discussion. It was Major and Blair who felt the need to privatise everything in sight and implemented the most ludicrous PPI/PFI initiatives.

And now even Politicians talk about “getting politicians out of” things like setting interest rates, running schools etc.. Let us trust the technocrats and spreadsheets, the think-tanks and the social “scientists'” research.

Mr. Judt reminds us that these things ARE political and we need to bring our minds and passions to bear on them.

40 days of Olympic Worship draw to a close


Place of Worship?

Cathedrals have Spires, Mosques have Minarets, Olympus has the Twisted Tower

As the great spasm draws to a close the anticipation of relief is (for me) quite delicious.

For over a month the dream world of the Olympics held us in sway and the infantile obsession with sport became a kind of religious orthodoxy. Millions have worshiped at the Sign of the Twisted Tower and felt part of “something bigger than themselves”. They have shared days of awe and wonder.

Like pilgrims to Mecca they will talk about their “hajj” for years to come. Like returnees from Rome and Santiago they have their souvenirs to remind them for years of their pious journey, the signs of their souls’ devotion.

Perhaps we should be glad that the aesthetics of worship have been commandeered by Coca Cola and the International Olympic Committee. The institutional monstrosities of traditional religion have been outgunned by the humanist celebration of elite excellence. This religion does not demand blood sacrifice or war on unbelievers. It is all harmless fun isn’t it?