I am am fed up with dear old WW. It has been impossible to avoid him and I am sure many a church member is tired of the “topical” references to his 200 year old Act by lazy preachers. Nearly half of all references mistakenly credit WW with abolishing slavery when all he did was to make the trade illegal.
He may have been (marginally) good for some oppressed people but I think he did the churches considerable harm. They began to see their mission in terms of civilising the British through publicity campaigns and social engineering. The moral crusading of the 19th and 20th centuries continually hyped and lauded the achievements of the Clapham sect (while generally ignoring the work of quakers and rationalists) as it rushed down the blind alley of social meddling in the name of Jesus.
Everything was cast in terms of abolishing the next “slavery” (child labour, votes for women, even banning alcohol in the name of setting free the slaves of drink). The current application of the slavery model is things like forced prostitution and chinese manufacturing.
Am I in favour of these bad things? No, but we already have a criminal code which should be able to deal with wrongs done in our jurisdiction and I doubt whether we can do much about China.
And I do not remember Jesus calling his disciples to do all this stuff.
The liberation of Black Americans came when THEY began to insist on taking their freedom. Most liberties have to be taken rather than given.